Typical republican...

Posted at July 17, 2008 6:13 PM in response to Third Rail: McCain Receives Social Security

Well amen to that!

Posted at July 16, 2008 5:33 PM in response to All The President's Moneymen

You are right. Both pregnancy and ED have to do with sex. Covering something that has to do with sex from a male perspective, while NOT covering something that has to do with sex from a female perspective is just wrong. And ED is NOT a medical emergency. If a man can't have sex, so what? He won't die from that.
Not covering birth control has nothing to do with medicine or business, it has to do with the idiotic argument that pregnancy is the "punishment" for sex--especially sex outside of marriage.

Posted at July 16, 2008 12:19 PM in response to The Illogic of Planned Parenthood

My last comment was in response to Bluebell's earlier comment. Man, this software is terrible!

Posted at July 12, 2008 1:45 PM in response to Can Progressives Unite, or Will It Be the Same Old Bit-Politics Story?

Amen. I also have a problem with the whole "progressive" label.
Either these are people who are too embarrassed to be liberals, or they are some weird subset group like libertarians.
In any case, as an old-time "bleeding heart liberal", I am not so sure that I want to even have much to do with these "progressives" let alone join them in unity...

Posted at July 12, 2008 1:36 PM in response to Can Progressives Unite, or Will It Be the Same Old Bit-Politics Story?

That was a reply to this by Jason (above):

"I would love to see this country elect a Dennis Kucinich or Ralph Nader. "

Posted at July 7, 2008 8:30 PM in response to Can someone please explain Bill Clinton?

RALPH NADER???? You HAVE to be kidding! You are a self-proclaimed "progressive", you are not a democrat. And progressives are to the democratic party as the libertarians are to the republican party--and as such, they are irrelevant.

Give it up Jason, Bill Clinton is not running for anything, so your opinion of him matters little if at all. As for Monica--she was a groupie and she got exactly what she wanted.

Posted at July 7, 2008 8:10 PM in response to Can someone please explain Bill Clinton?

Who cares about "progressives"? There are no politicians who are "progressives". Some of you seem to think that Obama is a progressive. Ha! Not a chance.

Bill is not a progressive either--he is a democrat. And there ARE a lot of people in this country who still really like Bill and would vote for him again if they could.

Posted at July 6, 2008 8:01 PM in response to Can someone please explain Bill Clinton?

Please stop trying to format anything on this web site--it is impossible to read!

Posted at June 24, 2008 11:34 AM in response to Is France Becoming More American?

My thoughts exactly!

Posted at June 19, 2008 9:08 PM in response to Will Obama okay capitulation and allow the FISA travesty to pass?